OUR NETWORK:TiVo Community TechLore Sling Community MyDigitalEntertainer See all... About UsAdvertiseContact Us

 
Learn about scoring Forum's Raw Score: 3584220.0
April 23, 2009 10:57 PM

Categories: Server Mods and Hacking

Member Avatar

WHS4u

  Member
Joined: 04/23/2009

Hi Everyone:

I just upgraded my brand new HP EX-485 WHS. I used the Intel Dual-Core E5200 (2.5GHz, 800 FSB, 2MB L2 cache).

I followed Donavon West from www.HomeServerHacks.com instructions. (Thanks Donavon).

The server is working just fine. There are no issues to report.

Here's some pics:

CPU

 CPU2

CPU2

 Hardware_Status

 Thanks to everyone on this great forum and the entire WHS family.

Marcos
-HP EX-485, Intel E5200 CPU upgrade, 4-750G HDs

Discussion:    Add a Comment | Comments 51-75 of 229 | Latest Comment | « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next »

May 3, 2009 1:30 PM

Check the Crucial site for 4 MB DDR2-800 DIMMs. Last time I checked they were about $104 each...goes off to look..here's the part number CT51272AF80E 4GB, 240-pin DIMM but the price is $130. Still not too bad, though... I tested with one for my Tom's story and it works great!

--Ed--

Ed Tittel 2443 Arbor Drive, Round Rock, TX 78681-2160
Bio, resume and list of pubs at www.edtittel.com
Contributing Editor, Tom's Guide
Expert Q'n'A/content for 6 TechTarget.com Web sites

May 3, 2009 4:47 PM

Are you sure about that? I'll be honest.. I actually ordered that one not realizing it was full buffered and ECC. It didn't fit.

I only saw 2 non-ecc un-buffered 4gb dimm's. They were from kingston and samsung and well over $200.

EX485 1x750GB 1x1TB 2x1.5TB
17" Macbook Pro 2.5 250GB OCZ Vertex SSD
Macbook white
2x Nvidia Mac mini's running Plex for movies
Macbook air Rev B 1.86/128GB SSD
Dell XPS 435MT Corei7 940 - 6GB Ram - 3x 30 GB OCZ Vertez Raid 0 - Nvida GTX 295

May 3, 2009 5:43 PM updated: May 4, 2009 9:23 AM

Whoops: good catch! I just checked the part number in the machine and its actually CT51264AA667 which is a 4GB DDR2-667 part (not DDR2-800). This one is non-ECC and costs $190. Ouch!

For a while there, Newegg had some 4GB non-ECC modules from ADATA available for about $105, but they've been on backorder ever since they surfaced. In another 6 months, though, this stuff will be commonplace.

Sorry about the initial mix-up.
--Ed--

PS [Added 5/4]: I have actually used this module in the EX475 so I'm pretty sure it will also work in the EX48* modules. Good thing memory speed doesn't matter as much on a server as on a desktop, eh?

Ed Tittel 2443 Arbor Drive, Round Rock, TX 78681-2160
Bio, resume and list of pubs at www.edtittel.com
Contributing Editor, Tom's Guide
Expert Q'n'A/content for 6 TechTarget.com Web sites

May 4, 2009 9:15 AM

I got the E5200 installed on Saturday with no problems. I ran OCCT with the standard test for 1 hour and it completed just fine.

I am running the video converter and the temperature in the console shows about 85 degrees while HWMonitor shows 68 degrees. Why the difference? Is there another good hardware monitoring tool that I can use to double check temperatures?

May 4, 2009 9:26 AM

About temps in HWMonitor:

For some reason the CPU core temps in the MSS tend to read low on multi-core CPUs (they're the same as the console readings for single-core models). I noticed the same thing on the EX47* models after installing dual-core CPUs into that machine as well. Given the option, the most accurate readings come either from the health monitor in the BIOS (but since that isn't available at runtime, only when booting, who cares?) and from the MSS console itself. I have also used Alfred Comparetti's SpeedFan (http://www.almico.com/sfdownload.php) on MSS models with good results.

HTH,
--Ed--

Ed Tittel 2443 Arbor Drive, Round Rock, TX 78681-2160
Bio, resume and list of pubs at www.edtittel.com
Contributing Editor, Tom's Guide
Expert Q'n'A/content for 6 TechTarget.com Web sites

May 4, 2009 11:38 AM

Thanks for the information and the link to SpeedFan, Ed.

Right now the console shows 72 degrees, HW Monitor shows 57 degrees for each core, and SpeedFan shows 62 for both cores. Interesting that they are all so different.

May 4, 2009 12:01 PM

Generally, different temps reported take the same readings and use different TJMax values to calculate actual temperatures. Read my TJMax blog to get a sense of how this can happen and what it generally means to the real temps in your device. My guess is that the "real temperature" is most likely to be properly reported in the console as long as you use the stock processor (which you aren't using here...;-) because they can provide very specific information about TJmax values. As soon as you change the processor, you'll want to do some research and learn TJMax values for your new proc (for most of those Intel processors, they're 95 degrees C BTW) and adjust accordingly. I believe there are options in both Speedfan and HWMonitor where you can adjust this data...

HTH,
--Ed--

Ed Tittel 2443 Arbor Drive, Round Rock, TX 78681-2160
Bio, resume and list of pubs at www.edtittel.com
Contributing Editor, Tom's Guide
Expert Q'n'A/content for 6 TechTarget.com Web sites

May 6, 2009 8:50 AM

Since the CPU upgrade my HP will not restart after the Scheduled shutdown !!!

May 6, 2009 10:30 AM

This usually means the MSS won't boot with the chip you've installed. Which chip did you insert? the 5200? We observed during extensive postings with the EX47* models that some people could get higher-TDP chips to work in their boxes, and yet the same chips wouldn't work in others. This may be what's happening to you. If the status light just keeps blinking and the box never boots, you're going to have to revert to your original CPU to get the unit operational again. Sorry!

The 5200 is a 65W TDP part. I personally had zero success in getting 65W AMD parts to work in a 475, and observed the symptoms I describe in the previous paragraph first-hand (with a non-low-wattage 3800+, in fact).

HTH,

--Ed--

Ed Tittel 2443 Arbor Drive, Round Rock, TX 78681-2160
Bio, resume and list of pubs at www.edtittel.com
Contributing Editor, Tom's Guide
Expert Q'n'A/content for 6 TechTarget.com Web sites

May 7, 2009 5:18 PM

Hey guys,

I have an EX485, and am definitely glad to have it. I'm enjoying reading about your experimentation with other processors. Have any of you considered the Celeron E1500 (2.2GHz dual core)? Is there something wrong with it that I'm missing?

Thanks!

May 7, 2009 5:56 PM updated: May 7, 2009 5:58 PM

No, there isn't, and if experience with the LE-16xx processors on the EX47* models is any indication, other 45 W Celeron procs will work well and deliver a painless performance boost, if a modest one. For many MSS hackers, multi-core CPUs have become a bit of a holy grail, and I have to speculate that's why they always attract lots of buzz and experimentation when new models come out.

I'm still waiting on an E4300 and an E5200, trying to score a Xeon L3110 (3 GHz, 45 W, dual core, 1333 MHz FSB, 6 MB L2 Cache), and plan to spend $40 on a Celeron 450 (also 45 W). I don't recognize the E1500--goes off to look--it's a 65 W part and may run too hot to work in the box (I'm expecting issues with the E4300 and E5200 for the same reason in fact). I feel like I have to try because some users here have reported success with the E5200, which naturally begs the question if a slow, cooler model (the E4300, in other words) might also work.

HTH, and good luck with your experiments. Please keep us posted on the results.

Best,
--Ed--

Ed Tittel 2443 Arbor Drive, Round Rock, TX 78681-2160
Bio, resume and list of pubs at www.edtittel.com
Contributing Editor, Tom's Guide
Expert Q'n'A/content for 6 TechTarget.com Web sites

May 7, 2009 6:12 PM

Thanks for your response, Ed. I'm not sure what everyone's motives are, but I'm not interested in the fastest CPU for my MSS, plus I want to keep power consumption low. A similar clock, but with an extra core would be nice for taking over video encoding duties. Overall, it'd be a lot more power efficient (albeit slower) than using my electron guzzling overclocked e6600 machine, which frankly, I'm not using for much else these days.

Unfortunately, I don't have much time these days to experiment with this stuff. But good luck to everyone who does!

May 7, 2009 6:40 PM

My advice then would be to go for the Celeron 450 instead of the E1500. The 450 is sure to work (same family and specs as the current chip, with same power envelope) and costs about the same as the 1500. I've found 'em for under $40 online.

HTH, and thanks for the clarification.
--Ed--

Ed Tittel 2443 Arbor Drive, Round Rock, TX 78681-2160
Bio, resume and list of pubs at www.edtittel.com
Contributing Editor, Tom's Guide
Expert Q'n'A/content for 6 TechTarget.com Web sites

May 7, 2009 7:32 PM updated: May 7, 2009 10:13 PM

EdTittel said: This usually means the MSS won't boot with the chip you've installed. Which chip did you insert? the 5200? We observed during extensive postings with the EX47* models that some people could get higher-TDP chips to work in their boxes, and yet the same chips wouldn't work in others. This may be what's happening to you. If the status light just keeps blinking and the box never boots, you're going to have to revert to your original CPU to get the unit operational again. Sorry! The 5200 is a 65W TDP part. I personally had zero success in getting 65W AMD parts to work in a 475, and observed the symptoms I describe in the previous paragraph first-hand (with a non-low-wattage 3800+, in fact). HTH, --Ed--
I fitted the 5200, it restarts fine when I push the button, but just doesn't restart it self at the scheduled restart time. i have just recieved my VGA keyboard/mouse hook up cable I am going to watch it post and poke around in the BIOS to see whats happening.

May 7, 2009 10:19 PM

Well it works, I can get into the BIOS, if you leave the keyboard and mouse connected and let the system boot it starts to go into a system recovery mode. However if you remove them it fires up as normal, I can see the desktop, but can't use the mouse and keyboard, but can use remote desktop to access the system. Not sure if there is any thing to change in the BIOS though. I saw that the memory speed can be altered slower and faster than 800Mhz... Any ideas? I also saw that the system has CPU speed stepping turned on.

May 8, 2009 11:04 PM updated: May 8, 2009 11:05 PM

techaholic said: Well it works, I can get into the BIOS, if you leave the keyboard and mouse connected and let the system boot it starts to go into a system recovery mode. However if you remove them it fires up as normal, I can see the desktop, but can't use the mouse and keyboard, but can use remote desktop to access the system. Not sure if there is any thing to change in the BIOS though. I saw that the memory speed can be altered slower and faster than 800Mhz... Any ideas? I also saw that the system has CPU speed stepping turned on.
I just got the VGA keyboard/mouse hook up cable too and the only thing that I'm going to change for now is the "CPU speed stepping" setting. For the record, I do not have any stability/connectivity/heat issues with the E5200. My only issue is that when I ran the OCCT stress test, the report is showing half of the speed frequency (1197MHz). I got into the BIOS and it reports 2500MHz. Now I just downloaded Intel's CPU ID (download here) and it also reports the CPU is running at half the speed... See image below:

CPU ID

This is why I'm thinking that by disabling the "Speed stepping" in the BIOS it may bring the CPU to show full speed.

Can you run the CPU ID program and see what reading you get? Keep us posted.

Thanks

Marcos
-HP EX-485, Intel E5200 CPU upgrade, 4-750G HDs

May 14, 2009 10:00 AM updated: May 14, 2009 10:00 AM

WHS4u said:
techaholic said: Well it works, I can get into the BIOS, if you leave the keyboard and mouse connected and let the system boot it starts to go into a system recovery mode. However if you remove them it fires up as normal, I can see the desktop, but can't use the mouse and keyboard, but can use remote desktop to access the system. Not sure if there is any thing to change in the BIOS though. I saw that the memory speed can be altered slower and faster than 800Mhz... Any ideas? I also saw that the system has CPU speed stepping turned on.
I just got the VGA keyboard/mouse hook up cable too and the only thing that I'm going to change for now is the "CPU speed stepping" setting. For the record, I do not have any stability/connectivity/heat issues with the E5200. My only issue is that when I ran the OCCT stress test, the report is showing half of the speed frequency (1197MHz). I got into the BIOS and it reports 2500MHz. Now I just downloaded Intel's CPU ID (download here) and it also reports the CPU is running at half the speed... See image below: CPU ID This is why I'm thinking that by disabling the "Speed stepping" in the BIOS it may bring the CPU to show full speed. Can you run the CPU ID program and see what reading you get? Keep us posted. Thanks
Did you try disabling the "Speed Stepping" yet ? been busy but will try to myself the weekend.

May 14, 2009 7:10 PM

Techaholic:

Yes! I just disabled the "Speed Stepping" in the BIOS and the results are good. I ran Intel's CPU ID afterwards:

CPU ID2

HP video conversion is about 60% faster after the BIOS change. It is a must after the CPU upgrade.

Cheers

Marcos
-HP EX-485, Intel E5200 CPU upgrade, 4-750G HDs

May 15, 2009 7:45 AM

Is there any way to disable speed stepping without going into the BIOS? That would be nice, but I'm not holding my breath.

How are your temps now Marcos? Are you noticing any difference?

May 15, 2009 9:31 AM

jutley said:

Is there any way to disable speed stepping without going into the BIOS? That would be nice, but I'm not holding my breath.

How are your temps now Marcos? Are you noticing any difference?


Jutley:

Unfortunately you can not make the changes from the WHS OS. Also, the way HP setup the MSS is that the BIOS "overrules" the OS. The "OS Plug n Play" feature is disabled in the BIOS.

Temps are the same as before, around 55C (fans around 1200 RPM) idle and it goes up to around 65C- 70C (fans around 1480 RPM) when converting videos.

Regarding the video conversion time, I have no scientific data but this:

Original movie format=AVI
Original video duration=01:26:56
Convert from AVI to MP4 (HQ)
Conversion time duration with CPU running @ 2.5GHz = 32 minutes
Conversion time duration with CPU running @ 1197MHz = 54 minutes

That is 22 minutes faster after the BIOS change.

Cheers

Marcos
-HP EX-485, Intel E5200 CPU upgrade, 4-750G HDs

May 15, 2009 11:06 AM

Is anyone interested in selling their used VGA cable? :)

May 15, 2009 12:03 PM

WHS4u said: Techaholic: Yes! I just disabled the "Speed Stepping" in the BIOS and the results are good. I ran Intel's CPU ID afterwards: CPU ID2 HP video conversion is about 60% faster after the BIOS change. It is a must after the CPU upgrade. Cheers
Thanks for the update, I will disable mine this weekend.  Cool

May 16, 2009 2:53 AM

Can the Processor do real time Software encoding?

May 16, 2009 7:15 AM

jutley said: Is anyone interested in selling their used VGA cable? :)
Can anyone tell me where we can get these cables?
 Thanks
gib

May 16, 2009 10:10 AM updated: May 16, 2009 10:11 AM

Gib said:
jutley said: Is anyone interested in selling their used VGA cable? :)
Can anyone tell me where we can get these cables?
 Thanks
gib

Marcos posted these links for us on page 2 of this thread:

 Buy cable here:  http://www.mediasmartserver.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=3980

 Instructions to get into the BIOS here:  http://www.mediasmartserver.net/2009/01/09/how-to-unlock-the-ex487-bios/ 

Discussion:    Add a Comment | Back to Top | Comments 51-75 of 229 | Latest Comment | « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next »

Add Your Reply

(will not be displayed)

Email me when comments are added to this thread

 
 

Please log in or register to participate in this community!

Log In

Remember

Not a member? Sign up!

Did you forget your password?

close this window
close this window