First off I think the upgrade should be free to legacy users who supported this product from day 1.
Second, if the upgrade requires a factory restore and does not upgrade the existing system then I am pretty certain I will not be upgrading.
I imaine that this DVD upgrade is being launched form a client?
How else would it be launched since the MediaSmart servers do not have a DVD drive or do they expect people to shell out for an external as well?
While I am very excited to here about the upgrade being made available I am quickly brought down to earth with the thought of a factory restore.
Some of us are using our servers with a custom setup. We now have to reconfigure everything if they can't nail this to the wall? ANd we pay for it nonetheless?
Doesn't seem fair.
HP Confirms 3.0 Upgrade for Legacy EX Series Owners, Available December
Categories: News, Rumors and Gossip Patches and Upgrades
HP's promised upgrade for previous generation MediaSmart Server is taking one step closer to reality.
According to this statement from HP's Allen Buckner, HP plans to make a 3.0 upgrade disc available to all legacy EX MediaSmart Server owners for a nominal fee.
While much of what we hypothesized back in may is coming to fruition, such as the EX47x loss of Photo Webshare, there are a few things we didn't expect. For example, HP is hoping to perform in-place upgrades, keeping all user data in tact, in leiu of a full factory restore.
Unfortunately, the LX195 won't be joining in the 3.0 fun. The reasons behind the mini-MediaSmart Servers's omission remain unanswered, but limitations of the Atom platform would be the most likely culprit.
Full statement below:
"Back in May, we announced a plan to allow current MediaSmart Server customers to upgrade to the most current software version beginning this Fall. Below are additional details on the plans to deliver these upgrades.
HP recently announced the new EX490/495 MediaSmart Servers. These Servers provide our latest software capabilities including an enhanced video converter, greater Mac Support including bare metal recovery, and a simplified user interface. It is this software version (3.0) that will be made available to existing EX470/475/485/487 customers. Note that these software upgrades are optional and will be available as a new installation DVD as opposed to a software download.
We are currently proceeding down the path of a server recovery solution that will not only upgrade your software to the 3.0 version, but also preserve the data in your shared folders. This approach is preferable to a factory reset that would otherwise require customers to manually offload and restore all server files that the customer wants to preserve. However, the server recovery approach requires additional testing cycles to validate the approach and the resulting data integrity. We expect the upgrade DVDs will be available to order through hp.com beginning in December, 2009. Note that if testing shows the server recovery solution to be problematic, our plan is to change the upgrade process to a factory reset.
As previously communicated, there will be certain limitations of this software upgrade depending on your product. For example, customers using the Photo Webshare feature in the EX470/475 products will lose this feature if they choose to upgrade (although we expect existing Webshare album photos will be moved into the Photos shared folder). In addition, customers who have not upgraded their DRAM in the EX470/475 products will likely experience sluggish behavior or limited functionality running certain aspects of the latest 3.0 software. Finally, the 3.0 software will not be made available for the LX195 model.
The final cost of the upgrade DVD is pending, but is expected to be in the US$25 range."
The price is certainly reasonable, and the features are certainly worth the investment. Still, we think EX470 and EX475 owners may think twice before taking the plunge. Tell us... what model do you have, and will you be upgrading? Post your comments below.
Read More In: News, Rumors and Gossip Patches and Upgrades
Stay up to date with the latest news and announcements regarding HP's MediaSmart Server and the MediaSmart Home Community.
I own the EX 485. just bought itabout a month ago. wish i would have known about the newer models. But yes, I will upgrade to 3.0.
I have an EX 475 and have had it since day one.I also do not think that the legacy owners should have to pay for the upgrade as BigJonson so aptly stated. I am not in favor of the factory restore possibility and I really like the Photo Webshare feature and I will probably NOT be upgrading my system.
It is really a shame that the ones that have supported HP since the beginning seem to taking this one on the chin.
Oh well it certainly is not fair.
Havent you folks every paid for software upgrades; and $25 is one of the lower upgrade costs I can think of.
Be happy that HP, 1)listened to their customers, and 2) followed thru, in addition 3)if the HP team doesnt think that their actions are appreciated they might not spend their undoubtedly tight development dollars on tasks like this again.
Thanks HP!
How this is "Unfair" is beyond me. You purchased a product 2 years ago, and you have an OPTION to upgrade to the latest version for a nominal price and thats unfair? It was certainly what you were looking for when you purchased it or else you wouldnt have spent the money, did you purchase it thinking any upgrades that come out im getting for free? Do you get a new version of Windows for free every time they come out with a new one? I was an early adopter and still own my EX47X and have been pleased with its performance but would like to upgrade to the 3.0 software and have upgraded the RAM in preparation for it, while it would be nice to get the upgrade for free I do not mind paying the $25 to have my Server an extra 2 years before people purchasing theirs now with 3.0 included.
I have the EX475, and I dont mind paying $25 for the 3.0 upgrade. Thanks HP!
I do look forward for some of the updates, but don`t want to loose the Photo Webshare feature..
Do anyone know if there is an alternative to the Photo Webshare?
Egil said: I have the EX475, and I dont mind paying $25 for the 3.0 upgrade. Thanks HP! I do look forward for some of the updates, but don`t want to loose the Photo Webshare feature.. Do anyone know if there is an alternative to the Photo Webshare?The 3.0 software does have the Photo Publisher as opposed to the Photo Webshare. If all you use Webshare for is sharing photos with others, Publisher can work for you. However, if you rely on Webshare's e-mailing abilities, or like Webshare so others in your family can upload photos, then it will be a step down. Best you can do is try Facebook, Snapfish, or some of the other online photo sites.
I would like to keep my software up-to-date, however, I do not agree with the "nominal" fee of $25. The upgrade should be free for early adopters. I will likely hold off on upgrading at this point, I have a lot of data on my server and based on the info, it seems as though, I would need to spend a weekend moving my data to external hard drive before the upgrade, too much work.
I have an EX485 I purchased in January. Except for a few add-ons I can easily re-install, I have very little data on the server that I don't already have on my main desktop PC (used to double as a server of sorts) and I think the $25 fee is definitely reasonable. I would upgrade right now if I could get it. I wish they would make it available to folks who don't mind doing the factory reset. Based on the news release above it seems the delay is all related to finding a way to avoid the factory reset.
I see now that my purchase of an LX 195 because of cost ($200 with purchase of an HP laptop) was a poor choice. It is less than six months old and HP, in effect, is saying it can't be upgraded.
I'll take the what and see approach. Full restore would be very time consuming. Not to mention I have no place to "save" the data I would have to restore. That's why I have the server. Cost is reasonable.
Looking forward to the improved GUI and other features as an EX470 upgraded to 2.8 cpu and 2GB ram i am ready and willing
View unverified member's comment - posted by Kerbs
I own an EX485 and can't imagine trying to get along without it. It's the single greatest investment I've made for my home network. I think $25 is a drop in the bucket. I will upgrade if they nail the upgrade process without the need for a factory reset. If it requires a factory reset I won't be interested at this time. Like everyone else, the whole purpose of the server is to store ALL your data.
Whether the 3.0 upgrade DVD is made available for free, $25 or $100 is irrelevant if the upgrade fails and ends up destroying several terabytes of precious data. That's my one and only concern. Since I first purchased the EX470, my " media jukebox" project has expanded to a sixteen-drive, 16 TB (8TBs x 2) configuration, with a fully loaded server, a Sans Digital TR4M eSATA port multiplier box and two Sans Digital TR4U USB towers. There is no simple or quick way to move or duplicate this amount of data, which took many, many hours to rip and upload from the over 5,000 CD and DVD discs in my collection, in addition to hundreds of digitized LPs from the vinyl era, which are additionally backed up onto CD-Rs. With RAM upgraded to 2GB and a more recent eSATA driver, my "old" EX470 system runs rock steady. I would be loath to have that change or to have to start reloading my media library all over again because of inadequately tested 3.0 upgrade software.
Related to this is the unresolved issue of how to upgrade to a new home server model from an old one. It should really be as simple as sliding out the hard drives from the old box, popping them in the new one and then upgrading the operating software on the primary drive. It isn't. It requires starting from zero with a factory reset and reformatting every "new" drive added, destroying what was already on them. In my view, home servers will never catch on with the general public with an upgrade process so tortuous and inherently risk-prone. A factory reset is not an upgrade. - it's a lobotomy.
In my view, the HP 3.0 software upgrade isn't that compelling in its own right, except as a down-payment on ongoing software improvements, of which many more are needed. For example, it is ridiculous that we need the intercession of a separate Vista (now Windows 7) PC to use the Windows Media Center features of the HP MediaSmart Connect x280n (or other extender), since in non-Windows Media Center mode it can access the very same data off the server directly. So why doesn't Windows Media Center run directly off the HP MediaSmart server? Why am I able to play ripped DVDs stored on my MediaSmart server on any PC in the house but not through the HP MediaSmart Connect? I realize that HP no longer makes or supports its media extender but the failure to support the world's most common video file structure, the only format which my old Samsung DVD recorder records in, doomed that product from the outset. I still use MediaSmart Connect to stream music (Windows 7 Media Center is quite an improvement in this regard), but it's forced me to move a media PC into the living room in order to stream movies with IFO menu navigation enabled. In short, the ability to convert DVD files into some other video format in 3.0 is a complete non-starter. I want and expect to be able to play DVD files natively. There are other media servers that claim they can do this. If so, that's an upgrade path worth taking.
Edge said: Whether the 3.0 upgrade DVD is made available for free, $25 or $100 is irrelevant if the upgrade fails and ends up destroying several terabytes of precious data. That's my one and only concern. Since I first purchased the EX470, my " media jukebox" project has expanded to a sixteen-drive, 16 TB (8TBs x 2) configuration, with a fully loaded server, a Sans Digital TR4M eSATA port multiplier box and two Sans Digital TR4U USB towers. There is no simple or quick way to move or duplicate this amount of data, which took many, many hours to rip and upload from the over 5,000 CD and DVD discs in my collection, in addition to hundreds of digitized LPs from the vinyl era, which are additionally backed up onto CD-Rs. With RAM upgraded to 2GB and a more recent eSATA driver, my "old" EX470 system runs rock steady. I would be loath to have that change or to have to start reloading my media library all over again because of inadequately tested 3.0 upgrade software. Related to this is the unresolved issue of how to upgrade to a new home server model from an old one. It should really be as simple as sliding out the hard drives from the old box, popping them in the new one and then upgrading the operating software on the primary drive. It isn't. It requires starting from zero with a factory reset and reformatting every "new" drive added, destroying what was already on them. In my view, home servers will never catch on with the general public with an upgrade process so tortuous and inherently risk-prone. A factory reset is not an upgrade. - it's a lobotomy. In my view, the HP 3.0 software upgrade isn't that compelling in its own right, except as a down-payment on ongoing software improvements, of which many more are needed. For example, it is ridiculous that we need the intercession of a separate Vista (now Windows 7) PC to use the Windows Media Center features of the HP MediaSmart Connect x280n (or other extender), since in non-Windows Media Center mode it can access the very same data off the server directly. So why doesn't Windows Media Center run directly off the HP MediaSmart server? Why am I able to play ripped DVDs stored on my MediaSmart server on any PC in the house but not through the HP MediaSmart Connect? I realize that HP no longer makes or supports its media extender but the failure to support the world's most common video file structure, the only format which my old Samsung DVD recorder records in, doomed that product from the outset. I still use MediaSmart Connect to stream music (Windows 7 Media Center is quite an improvement in this regard), but it's forced me to move a media PC into the living room in order to stream movies with IFO menu navigation enabled. In short, the ability to convert DVD files into some other video format in 3.0 is a complete non-starter. I want and expect to be able to play DVD files natively. There are other media servers that claim they can do this. If so, that's an upgrade path worth taking.
Fortunately, I dont "feel your pain" which is obviously quite real.
You clearly have more than a normal WHomeS or home-scaled system; yours is more a "deployment" as we would say in the IT world.
For me, as I "only" have 450gb of music duped on 2 drives (1tb and 7540gig) my solution for the upgrade will be to do as you mentioned; just pop out my dup drive, do the upgrade and then, if necesary drag over my stuff to the sys drive and then after making sure its all there wipe my dup drive to re-set it as a new dup drive. I also use the Squeezebox Duet for my music streaming and this works very well together likely almost as well as some of my friends who have spent thousands more on their custom installer solutions.
I am looking forward to this upgrade as I will have a better streaming solution without needing to continue to investigate other outboard streaming and photo sharing solutions. In general with friends using other stuff like WD HD drive solutions - there seem to be alot of ways to go here. But I think that this has been best solution for me and they only way that I could have reasonably continued to build my library - and soon branch out to video - likey with the upgrade.
I also believe the WHS solution to clearly be too complex for the usual home user - but it is good for the hobbyist and likely for the custom installer. I think the HP hw/sw upgrade path shows committment to this product and continues to build more value - but it is a "sweet spot" product not for those who want to either stream an ipod OR build it out too wide, unfortunately.
I have had my EX 485 for 2 months now and it has not met expectations by any means.
Serves files slower than the old G4 Mac Mini (using USB drives as storage) that it was supposed to replace. (am still using as my primary server on account of lack of confidence in the Ex 485)
Remote access crashes every week or two requiring manual local intervention to restart. When it does work, it is slower than molasses, essentially useless. I even tried increasing my upload bandwidth to 1.5 gigs from 300 mbs using ISP upgrade and it did not show any improvement!
Still have not figured out how to move terabytes of data onto it without using sloooow ethernet.
Unable to do much at all with it using my Macbook Pro.
Even suggesting the idea that a software update could put your data at risk is beyond my comprehension.
Noisy POS fans too.
So if they fixed it, for $25 would be worth recovering what has so far been a bad investment - a very immature product, evidenced by the frequent hardware updates and infrequent software updates.
The last hardware update (Gen 3) was actually quite minimal and I can't help but wonder why a software update for Gen 2 would take so long.
HP has to understand that a product in a segment like this needs to build a critical mass to become successful. When they abuse the early adopters and provide such infrequent fixes to blatant defects, I am expecting an erosion in the existing user base well before any critical mass develops for them.
So do I dump now and save $25/possibly further time wasted and frustration or pay the $25 and invest the time to see if this project can be salvaged?
Frankly Gen 3 does not fix the inability to hook up a USB hard drive and transfer large volume data onto or off of it. For me, I am thinking that this is still a terminally serious defect.
Guido said: I have had my EX 485 for 2 months now and it has not met expectations by any means. Serves files slower than the old G4 Mac Mini (using USB drives as storage) that it was supposed to replace. (am still using as my primary server on account of lack of confidence in the Ex 485) Remote access crashes every week or two requiring manual local intervention to restart. When it does work, it is slower than molasses, essentially useless. I even tried increasing my upload bandwidth to 1.5 gigs from 300 mbs using ISP upgrade and it did not show any improvement! Still have not figured out how to move terabytes of data onto it without using sloooow ethernet. Unable to do much at all with it using my Macbook Pro. Even suggesting the idea that a software update could put your data at risk is beyond my comprehension. Noisy POS fans too. So if they fixed it, for $25 would be worth recovering what has so far been a bad investment - a very immature product, evidenced by the frequent hardware updates and infrequent software updates. The last hardware update (Gen 3) was actually quite minimal and I can't help but wonder why a software update for Gen 2 would take so long. HP has to understand that a product in a segment like this needs to build a critical mass to become successful. When they abuse the early adopters and provide such infrequent fixes to blatant defects, I am expecting an erosion in the existing user base well before any critical mass develops for them. So do I dump now and save $25/possibly further time wasted and frustration or pay the $25 and invest the time to see if this project can be salvaged? Frankly Gen 3 does not fix the inability to hook up a USB hard drive and transfer large volume data onto or off of it. For me, I am thinking that this is still a terminally serious defect.
I actually disagree with virtually everything you've said. I won't address it all, but I will highlight some of your stranger remarks.
"I even tried increasing my upload bandwidth to 1.5 gigs from 300 mbs using ISP upgrade and it did not show any improvement!"
I don't believe anyone has a 1.5 GB upload connection to their ISP.
"Still have not figured out how to move terabytes of data onto it without using sloooow ethernet." and "Frankly Gen 3 does not fix the inability to hook up a USB hard drive and transfer large volume data onto or off of it. For me, I am thinking that this is still a terminally serious defect."
Actually, gigabit ethernet would offer greater transfer speeds than USB. Sounds like the issue is with your antiquated network hardware.
"Even suggesting the idea that a software update could put your data at risk is beyond my comprehension."
Who said a software update puts data at risk?
"a very immature product, evidenced by the frequent hardware updates and infrequent software updates. "
Wrong. Since the release of the initial EX470, there have been two hardware revisions and roughly 7 or 8 (that I can think of) software updates.
"HP has to understand that a product in a segment like this needs to build a critical mass to become successful. When they abuse the early adopters and provide such infrequent fixes to blatant defects, I am expecting an erosion in the existing user base well before any critical mass develops for them. "
Windows Home Server, and the HP MediaSmart Server have been quite successful. Furthermore, You haven't specified any actual 'defects' with the MediaSmart Server, and the majority of your complaints that could be legitimate, like the "slow feeling" remote access, would be better aimed at Microsoft than HP. Your other complaints are just ridiculous.
View unverified member's comment - posted by Ty
Matt,
Thank you for setting that straight, I was thinking many of the same things you stated in response to Guidos comments. I have had my EX470 since it was first released and although there is room for improvement indeed, for a personal home server I think it delivers on most of what it promises. It seems as though many of these people are looking for full blown servers at a fraction of the price and are disappointed when they realize they bought the wrong thing on behalf of a lack of their own research.
Quick question if you happen to read this. Does the media collector automatically grab media from backed up computers and place it in the music/movies/pictures folders without duplicating it? This is what ive envisioned it as and have never been clear in the description. Its one of the things which has bugged me about the 470, I have all my music on my computer thus included in the backup yet when I want to have it in the Music folder in order to share remotely it is just a duplicate, is this still the case or does the media collector solve this issue?
Ty,
Just so you know HP has publicly reversed their decision to void waranties based on Memory upgrades. I upgraded mine 6 months ago or so and it was pretty pain free. As far as upgrading the processor I do not know, don't think HP mentioned that in the warranty reversal so that may still void it.
Rhanson84 said: Matt, Thank you for setting that straight, I was thinking many of the same things you stated in response to Guidos comments. I have had my EX470 since it was first released and although there is room for improvement indeed, for a personal home server I think it delivers on most of what it promises. It seems as though many of these people are looking for full blown servers at a fraction of the price and are disappointed when they realize they bought the wrong thing on behalf of a lack of their own research. Quick question if you happen to read this. Does the media collector automatically grab media from backed up computers and place it in the music/movies/pictures folders without duplicating it? This is what ive envisioned it as and have never been clear in the description. Its one of the things which has bugged me about the 470, I have all my music on my computer thus included in the backup yet when I want to have it in the Music folder in order to share remotely it is just a duplicate, is this still the case or does the media collector solve this issue? Ty, Just so you know HP has publicly reversed their decision to void waranties based on Memory upgrades. I upgraded mine 6 months ago or so and it was pretty pain free. As far as upgrading the processor I do not know, don't think HP mentioned that in the warranty reversal so that may still void it.
Well said. I certainly agree there's room for improvement, and I'm glad to know I'm not the only one who believes WHS and the MSS in particular delivers when expectations are not completely out of whack.
As far as your question on Media Collector, I want to be sure I completely understand your question. I believe you're asking if the Home Server copies over your music as part of a complete backup, and Media Collector grabs it for collection, will it occupy double space on the server? I know for sure that files that exist across multiple PCs, when backed up, will not. Since these files are not part of a backup, I can't say for certain, but I'm inclined to say they will take additional space on the server if grabbed by collector. I'm running a test now to see if that's the case, and so far it's panning out. If so, you can always exclude your music folders from the PC backup, and rely on collector to keep them housed on the server.
View unverified member's comment - posted by Ty
Edge said: Whether the 3.0 upgrade DVD is made available for free, $25 or $100 is irrelevant if the upgrade fails and ends up destroying several terabytes of precious data. That's my one and only concern. Since I first purchased the EX470, my " media jukebox" project has expanded to a sixteen-drive, 16 TB (8TBs x 2) configuration, with a fully loaded server, a Sans Digital TR4M eSATA port multiplier box and two Sans Digital TR4U USB towers. There is no simple or quick way to move or duplicate this amount of data, which took many, many hours to rip and upload from the over 5,000 CD and DVD discs in my collection, in addition to hundreds of digitized LPs from the vinyl era, which are additionally backed up onto CD-Rs. With RAM upgraded to 2GB and a more recent eSATA driver, my "old" EX470 system runs rock steady. I would be loath to have that change or to have to start reloading my media library all over again because of inadequately tested 3.0 upgrade software. Related to this is the unresolved issue of how to upgrade to a new home server model from an old one. It should really be as simple as sliding out the hard drives from the old box, popping them in the new one and then upgrading the operating software on the primary drive. It isn't. It requires starting from zero with a factory reset and reformatting every "new" drive added, destroying what was already on them. In my view, home servers will never catch on with the general public with an upgrade process so tortuous and inherently risk-prone. A factory reset is not an upgrade. - it's a lobotomy. In my view, the HP 3.0 software upgrade isn't that compelling in its own right, except as a down-payment on ongoing software improvements, of which many more are needed. For example, it is ridiculous that we need the intercession of a separate Vista (now Windows 7) PC to use the Windows Media Center features of the HP MediaSmart Connect x280n (or other extender), since in non-Windows Media Center mode it can access the very same data off the server directly. So why doesn't Windows Media Center run directly off the HP MediaSmart server? Why am I able to play ripped DVDs stored on my MediaSmart server on any PC in the house but not through the HP MediaSmart Connect? I realize that HP no longer makes or supports its media extender but the failure to support the world's most common video file structure, the only format which my old Samsung DVD recorder records in, doomed that product from the outset. I still use MediaSmart Connect to stream music (Windows 7 Media Center is quite an improvement in this regard), but it's forced me to move a media PC into the living room in order to stream movies with IFO menu navigation enabled. In short, the ability to convert DVD files into some other video format in 3.0 is a complete non-starter. I want and expect to be able to play DVD files natively. There are other media servers that claim they can do this. If so, that's an upgrade path worth taking.
I, too, have an EX470 and would be very interested to hear about your configuration and hardware setup. I currently have 8 tb and would really like to add more to it, but I don't really want to use USB connections.
Any information you can share would be greatly appreciated.
Matt Whitlock said:
As far as your question on Media Collector, I want to be sure I completely understand your question. I believe you're asking if the Home Server copies over your music as part of a complete backup, and Media Collector grabs it for collection, will it occupy double space on the server? I know for sure that files that exist across multiple PCs, when backed up, will not. Since these files are not part of a backup, I can't say for certain, but I'm inclined to say they will take additional space on the server if grabbed by collector. I'm running a test now to see if that's the case, and so far it's panning out. If so, you can always exclude your music folders from the PC backup, and rely on collector to keep them housed on the server.
Thanks Matt. I believe you suggested a good solution. My issue jut to be a tad clearer is I have all my music on my desktop and have it being included in a backup. I would like to be able to access it using the Remote Features in order to listen to it but the only way I know how to do that is it must be in the Shared folders so I put some in the Music Folder but I have several hundred Gigs of music so if I put all my music in the folder and have the backup with the music in it I am essentially duplicating it on the server. I wasnt sure if the Media Collector was able to comb through backups and just use the backups and point to them, but im doubting this so I think your solution for not including the Music in the backup and just having it stored in the Music folder will be the solution. I will have to wait till 3.0 comes to test but I am looking forward to it. Thanks for the help
Gemini9674 said:Edge said: Whether the 3.0 upgrade DVD is made available for free, $25 or $100 is irrelevant if the upgrade fails and ends up destroying several terabytes of precious data. That's my one and only concern. Since I first purchased the EX470, my " media jukebox" project has expanded to a sixteen-drive, 16 TB (8TBs x 2) configuration, with a fully loaded server, a Sans Digital TR4M eSATA port multiplier box and two Sans Digital TR4U USB towers. There is no simple or quick way to move or duplicate this amount of data, which took many, many hours to rip and upload from the over 5,000 CD and DVD discs in my collection, in addition to hundreds of digitized LPs from the vinyl era, which are additionally backed up onto CD-Rs. With RAM upgraded to 2GB and a more recent eSATA driver, my "old" EX470 system runs rock steady. I would be loath to have that change or to have to start reloading my media library all over again because of inadequately tested 3.0 upgrade software. Related to this is the unresolved issue of how to upgrade to a new home server model from an old one. It should really be as simple as sliding out the hard drives from the old box, popping them in the new one and then upgrading the operating software on the primary drive. It isn't. It requires starting from zero with a factory reset and reformatting every "new" drive added, destroying what was already on them. In my view, home servers will never catch on with the general public with an upgrade process so tortuous and inherently risk-prone. A factory reset is not an upgrade. - it's a lobotomy. In my view, the HP 3.0 software upgrade isn't that compelling in its own right, except as a down-payment on ongoing software improvements, of which many more are needed. For example, it is ridiculous that we need the intercession of a separate Vista (now Windows 7) PC to use the Windows Media Center features of the HP MediaSmart Connect x280n (or other extender), since in non-Windows Media Center mode it can access the very same data off the server directly. So why doesn't Windows Media Center run directly off the HP MediaSmart server? Why am I able to play ripped DVDs stored on my MediaSmart server on any PC in the house but not through the HP MediaSmart Connect? I realize that HP no longer makes or supports its media extender but the failure to support the world's most common video file structure, the only format which my old Samsung DVD recorder records in, doomed that product from the outset. I still use MediaSmart Connect to stream music (Windows 7 Media Center is quite an improvement in this regard), but it's forced me to move a media PC into the living room in order to stream movies with IFO menu navigation enabled. In short, the ability to convert DVD files into some other video format in 3.0 is a complete non-starter. I want and expect to be able to play DVD files natively. There are other media servers that claim they can do this. If so, that's an upgrade path worth taking.I, too, have an EX470 and would be very interested to hear about your configuration and hardware setup. I currently have 8 tb and would really like to add more to it, but I don't really want to use USB connections. Any information you can share would be greatly appreciated.
There really isn’t that much to tell. The key advantage of the original EX470/5 over all subsequent HP home servers until the EX490/5 release has been the ability to support a four-bay eSATA port multiplier box (the new models will apparently support five-bays). What the original EX470 lacked was sufficient RAM. A RAM upgrade to 2GB is fairly simple to accomplish, and how to do it is well documented at various user websites. The only other unauthorized change I made to my EX470 was to upgrade the eSATA driver, the original one that comes preloaded with the server apparently causing problems with certain Sans Digital eSATA port multiplier installations. Once you start adding external drives, you will also need the Windows Home Server Disk Management add-in from Tentacle Software to keep proper track of everything.
With 2TB drives now available (although still too expensive) it is possible to replicate my 16TB installation (2 x 8TB) using only the server and a port multiplier box. I initially started off using single external USB drives for expansion (I had four at one point) but these ran dangerously hot to the touch in their metal enclosures, and were a rat’s nest of cords and cables. Why HP would recommend external USB drives in a 24/7 home server configuration is beyond me. A fan-cooled tower (eSATA or USB) is the only way to go in my view.
I eventually purchased a four-bay e-SATA port multiplier box from Sans Digital (four bays being the maximum supported by the EX470). It took me a long while to realize that the EX470 would also support a USB tower, since this is nowhere indicated in the product literature. Eventually, I added two “matching” four-bay SATA USB towers from Sans Digital, in order to enable full folder duplication for my ripped video library. The system now has 16 hard drives totalling 16 terabytes, ranging in size from 1.5TB to 500GB, the latter being the original drive that came with my EX470, currently installed in one of the USB towers. (The lowest capacity drives go into the USB towers; the highest capacity drives go into the server and the eSATA port multiplier box.)
I will likely add one more USB tower before I am through, but this is not the ideal solution in the long run. If HP had been on the ball, they would have built their latest home server with two, ideally three, port-multiplier-enabled eSATA ports, rather than just the one. From a hardware perspective, the only real advantage of HP’s new home server models over my RAM-upgraded EX470 is the ability to support a five-bay port multiplier box, instead of my 4. I’ll therefore be keeping my EX470 until something truly groundbreaking comes along, even if I can’t upgrade the software to 3.0.
I have found no problems streaming DVD video content off the USB towers over a wireless N connection, as long as the server isn’t doing intensive folder duplication or data backups at the same time. Unless you plan to rip and stream HD video, I would not be concerned about adding one or more USB towers to your system.


RSS

